Opinion
Iran After Khamenei: The Region Gets One Chance at an Off-Ramp — Don’t Waste It
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Iran after Khamenei is being pulled by two crowds, and the world’s next decade depends on which one its invisible new leader chooses to hear.
The first crowd is in the streets. Millions are mourning Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in ceremonies running through 9 July, and by the second day the chants at Tehran’s Grand Mosalla had hardened into calls for defiance and revenge. Grief of that scale is real, and after a year in which American and Israeli strikes killed Iranians and humiliated the state, the anger is not manufactured.
The second crowd met quietly in Doha. Days before the funeral, US and Iranian negotiators — kept in separate rooms, speaking through Qatari and Pakistani mediators — made what Qatar called “positive progress”: a communication channel agreed, frozen funds and the Strait of Hormuz on the table, another round promised once the mourning ends.
This page believes the second crowd deserves to win, and that saying so plainly matters.
Why Iran after Khamenei could go either way
The case for pessimism is easy. The new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, has not been seen in public since February — he did not appear even at his father’s funeral, which three of his brothers attended. A leadership that opaque, installed by succession rather than any popular mandate, may find belligerence the cheapest way to manufacture legitimacy. Funeral fury converts easily into policy.
But consider what the fury conceals. Iran’s people have endured war, sanctions, isolation and inflation. The state’s proudest deterrents failed to prevent this year’s strikes. And a mourning period is, paradoxically, the safest political moment to change course: concessions made now can be framed as strength preserved for the martyred leader’s legacy rather than surrender to enemies. Openings like this do not stay open.
The demand on Washington is equally sharp. If the talks resume and America treats them as a victor’s dictation — all pressure, no sanctions relief, no released funds — it will hand Tehran’s hardliners the proof they need that diplomacy is a trap. Wars end through exits that let both sides walk out upright. Anyone who forgets that is negotiating for an audience, not an outcome.
The measure that matters
We are a freethought publication; we hold no brief for theocracy, and this page has said clearly what Iran’s system does to its atheists, its women and its dissidents. But the first duty in July 2026 is more basic: fewer missiles, fewer funerals, fewer children sleeping in metro stations from Kyiv to wherever the next front opens. The talks in Doha are the only mechanism on the table that points that way.
The mourning ends on 9 July. What Iran’s rulers — and America’s — do on 10 July will tell us whether this year’s grief taught anyone anything.
